Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volume 44Robert Clark, 1887 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 7
Page 1
... Lucas county , whose existing term of office commenced November 11 , 1883 , and had qualified and entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office , an appointment November 3 , 1885 , by a judge whose existing term of office ...
... Lucas county , whose existing term of office commenced November 11 , 1883 , and had qualified and entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office , an appointment November 3 , 1885 , by a judge whose existing term of office ...
Page 2
... county of Lucas . The act of April 2 , 1882 ( 79 Ohio L. 79 ) , provides for the appointment of assistant prosecuting attorneys in the counties of Hamilton , Cuyahoga , and Lucas . In the first named county , the presiding judge is ...
... county of Lucas . The act of April 2 , 1882 ( 79 Ohio L. 79 ) , provides for the appointment of assistant prosecuting attorneys in the counties of Hamilton , Cuyahoga , and Lucas . In the first named county , the presiding judge is ...
Page 3
... Lucas county . The first act authorizing an assistant prosecuting attorney for Lucas county was passed May 11 , 1878. Appointments were made under this law , but they are not understood to be of consequence here . April 2 , 1880 , the ...
... Lucas county . The first act authorizing an assistant prosecuting attorney for Lucas county was passed May 11 , 1878. Appointments were made under this law , but they are not understood to be of consequence here . April 2 , 1880 , the ...
Page 4
... Lucas county . The question to be determined is , whether the sen- ior judge was the one who had served longest under his present commission , or the one who had been longest in continuous service ? It is not insisted by any one that ...
... Lucas county . The question to be determined is , whether the sen- ior judge was the one who had served longest under his present commission , or the one who had been longest in continuous service ? It is not insisted by any one that ...
Page 11
... Lucas county , and the defendant in this case , of the validity of the appointments made October , 1882 , and October , 1883 , both of which were made by a judge who assumed to be the senior judge because he held by what was , at the ...
... Lucas county , and the defendant in this case , of the validity of the appointments made October , 1882 , and October , 1883 , both of which were made by a judge who assumed to be the senior judge because he held by what was , at the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
alimony alleged Allen County amount answer apply appointed Arcade Hotel assembly assessment Attorney-General authority averment bill bond Brewster canal cause of action charge Cincinnati claim Clark commissioners common pleas constitution contract corporation counsel court of common creditors Cuyahoga county deceased deed defendant in error demurrer district court divorce dower duty election evidence ex rel facts filed Gelhaus Hamilton county held Herron husband indorser intoxicating liquors journal judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury lands lease legislative legislature liability lien Lucas county mayor ment mortgage notice Ohio St Olive McGill owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded premises premium probate court proceeding question quo warranto Railroad Company Railway Company reason Revised Statutes rule Sarah Clark senate Smith supra sureties term thereof Thompson tion traffic trial Wiatt wife