Response to the Landmine Threat in Bosnia: Hearing Before the Military Research and Development Subcommittee, Joint with the Military Procurement Subcommittee, of the Committee on National Security, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Second Session, Hearing Held January 24, 1996 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 17
Page 8
... panels . The first panel will review the landmine threat in Bosnia and the United States policy for and capabilities of dealing with that spe- cific threat . Panel two will discuss procurement , research and de- velopment , and ...
... panels . The first panel will review the landmine threat in Bosnia and the United States policy for and capabilities of dealing with that spe- cific threat . Panel two will discuss procurement , research and de- velopment , and ...
Page 11
... panel . With that , we will turn to Mr. Reeder , who is an intelligence an- alyst for the National Ground Intelligence Center . Thank you , and you may begin . STATEMENT OF THOMAS REEDER , LANDMINE WARFARE ANALYST , NATIONAL GROUND ...
... panel . With that , we will turn to Mr. Reeder , who is an intelligence an- alyst for the National Ground Intelligence Center . Thank you , and you may begin . STATEMENT OF THOMAS REEDER , LANDMINE WARFARE ANALYST , NATIONAL GROUND ...
Page 26
... panel and a technology panel . Some testimony will overlap , but it is not only because the panel members prepared for these hearings independently . Please consider that the overlap rep- resents different perspectives of the same ...
... panel and a technology panel . Some testimony will overlap , but it is not only because the panel members prepared for these hearings independently . Please consider that the overlap rep- resents different perspectives of the same ...
Page 39
... panel " procedure . While there are no significant differences at the macro level , we certainly share many tactical ideas developed by our allies . As only one example , we have used the Canadian engineer mine guide 10 39.
... panel " procedure . While there are no significant differences at the macro level , we certainly share many tactical ideas developed by our allies . As only one example , we have used the Canadian engineer mine guide 10 39.
Page 46
... panel has got a lot more to say about this . Mr. SISISKY . That may not be the problem . General GILL . If I could defer to them , unless Mr. Reeder wants to add something . Mr. REEDER . Just the only point I might make is that it is al ...
... panel has got a lot more to say about this . Mr. SISISKY . That may not be the problem . General GILL . If I could defer to them , unless Mr. Reeder wants to add something . Mr. REEDER . Just the only point I might make is that it is al ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ACTD agencies antipersonnel mines Armor BACHKOSKY BEAUCHAMP blast booby trap breaching Chairman clear clearance Command committee countermine capabilities countermine operations countermine program Countermine System countermine technologies Dayton agreement Department of Defense deployed to Bosnia detection and neutralization Detection System detonate devices doctrine efforts equipment evaluated Explosive Ordnance Disposal field forces in Bosnia funding fuze GILL ground penetrating radar hand-held HMMWV humanitarian demining HUNTER improved infrared Jefferson Proving Ground kits land mines landmine threat Landmine Warfare Marine Corps MAZZAFRO metal detector Milton minefields mission nology nonmetallic Operation Joint Endeavor panel percent plows pressure-fuzed problem protection Reeder Reingruber RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT responsible rollers science and technology Secretary of Defense sensors SINGLEY soldiers solutions Somalia Standoff tech technical Thank theater things threat in Bosnia tion troops Tuzla U.S. Army U.S. forces unexploded ordnance United UNPROFOR vehicle mounted WELDON