Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963)

.14

OTHER CITATIONS:

Report on the panel of legal clinics meeting at
Miami, October, 1963 at the National Convention
of the National Legal Aid and Public Defender
Association . . .

Article by Justice Brennan, United States Supreme
Court, in The Legal Aid Brief Case, April, 1963
issue, Vol. XXI, No. 4 . .

Letter from George D. Harrell, H.D., Dean, College

of Medicine, University of Florida, dated December 9,

1963 ..

Letter from John K. Robinson, M.D., Associate Dean,
School of Medicine, University of Miami, dated
Canuary 15, 1964

Survey report on legal clinics by Mr. Junius L.
ison, Associate Director, National Legal Aid
and Defender Association

...

Statement from a brochure if the American Law
Student Association, American Bar Center, Chicago,

Report taken from Education for Professional
Responsibility in the Law School - Preliminary
Reports on Seven Experimental Projects by The
National Council on Legal Clinics, American Bar
Center, Chicago 37, Illinois, 1962 .

3, 4

4, 5

5, 6

[graphic]

6

6, 7

[merged small][ocr errors]

Letter from Mr. Charles A. Bellows, Chairman, American Bar Association Section on Criminal Law, dated January 21, 1964.

Letter of General Charles L. Decker, Director
National Defender Project, American Bar Center
and currently Chairman of the American Bar
Association Committee on Legal Education, dated
March 13, 1964 .

Citation from Sixth Amendment of the Federal
Constitution

Page

7

7, 8

13

Statement taken from the amicus curiae brief filed in behalf of the 22 attorneys general in Gideon v. Wainwright, page 24

17

Journal of the American Judicature Society
Vol. 47, No. 8, January 1964

21

Letter from the Acting Dean, University of Miami, dated October 4, 1963 ..

.22, 23

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

CERTAIN ALLEGED PROBLEMS POSED BY THOSE WHO QUESTION THE ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED RULE. THEY ARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Rule results in inferential scorn of the criminal

practice in that it suggests the practice of criminal

law is less complex than the practice of civil law. 2. It invades the practical realm, which should be precluded to the law schools.

1. It places the student beyond the control of the Bar or the court as to disciplinary measures or matters involving professional ethics.

4. The Rule results in loss of income to practicing attorneys. 5. The term "general supervision" of a Public Defender, is

too broad.

6. The Rule would be a violation of the principle laid

down in Gideon v. Wainwright.

7. The Rule would pose a violation of the "privileged
communication" rule as between attorney and client.

8. The Public Defender Clinic is limited to a small
number of students and therefore loses its value.
9. The adoption of the Rule results in a lowering of the
standards of the Bar.

3. The schools and students "can implement

program of

student participation in litigation with the approval of the trial courts and the Public Defender or court assigned counsel without the promulgation of a rule by the Supreme Court of Florida."

[merged small][ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »