Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Appendix I

GAO's Capital Budget Proposal

We propose restructuring the current unified budget to include an operating and a capital budget within the unified budget. As table I.1 shows, the operating component of the restructured unified budget would report all operating revenues and expenses for programs and activities that are not classified as capital investments as well as the "operating surplus/deficit." The capital component of the restructured unified budget, as illustrated in table I.2, would report the revenues, investments, and "capital financing requirements" for federal capital investment activities.

Under our proposal, amounts received from the public, or nonfederal
sources, which are currently offset against gross outlays, would be
treated differently. Such amounts, currently termed "proprietary
receipts" and "offsetting collections," are not reported as "budget
receipts." Rather, they are netted against gross outlays to produce the
(net) outlay totals in the budget. In effect, these receipts and collections
are "buried" in the outlay totals. In fiscal year 1988, these receipts and
collections totaled $168.7 billion, and they included such amounts as
loan repayments received by federal lending agencies; medicare premi-
ums; sales of government assets, products, and services; and rent and
royalties from outer continental shelf leases.

We have recommended against netting such amounts against gross outlays on the grounds that the resultant outlay totals understate the true level of federal outlays.1 Under our proposal, these amounts would not be netted against gross disbursements for purposes of calculating operating expenses and capital investments. Rather, they would be reported as budget receipts. This results in expense and investment figures in the capital budget (see table 3) which are larger than the outlays reported in the current unified budget (see table 2). Throughout this report, our restructured budget amounts reflect this new approach. Such an approach does not, however, change the "bottom line," that is, the unified budget financing requirements.

1Federal Budget Outlay Estimates: A Growing Problem (GAO/PAD-79-20, February 9, 1979) and Federal Budget Totals Are Understated Because of Current Practices (GAO/PAD-81-22, December 31, 1980).

[blocks in formation]

We should note that because of our approach and the quality of existing data on capital expenditures and asset consumption charges (depreciation), we had to make several assumptions in developing the numbers.

GAO's Capital Budget Proposal

Therefore, we would emphasize that the numbers in all the tables in this report are approximations for illustrative purposes only. Appendix VI discusses the methodology that we used in developing our budget numbers.

Operating Component of Restructured Budget

The operating component of the restructured budget, as illustrated in table I.1, would report all operating revenues and expenses for programs and activities that are not classified as capital investments. The revenues would include general taxes; payroll and other earmarked taxes; and fees, royalties, and other earnings. As for expenses, they would include the costs of civil functions, the defense function, and the interest on the national debt.

In addition to the above expenses, we would add two costs not currently recognized in the budget. The first cost would be an "asset consumption charge" which represents the consumption of the federal government's physical assets. Because the current budget does not include an asset consumption charge, it misstates the true cost of operating the government. Adding this cost to the operating budget would eliminate this omission and, therefore, improve cost comparisons between operating and capital programs. This asset consumption amount would be appropriated in the operating budget and credited to the capital budget.

The second cost would be the estimated subsidy costs associated with the budget year's new direct loans and loan guarantees. For direct loans, this would be the government's expected net loss on new loans, considering defaults and interest rate costs. On the latter cost, the government often earns lower interest on the loans it extends than the interest it must pay on the funds it borrows to finance those loans. Focusing on such costs rather than gross loan disbursements would put direct loan programs on a comparable basis with grant programs.

For loan guarantees, the subsidy costs would be the estimated pay-
ments, net of guarantee premiums and recoveries, the government
makes to lenders when federally-insured borrowers default on the loans.
Since currently these costs are not reflected in the budget when the loan
guarantees are authorized, it appears that these guarantees are cost
free. By including the estimated subsidy costs of loan guarantees in the
operating budget (and requiring appropriations for these amounts when
the guarantee authority is approved), the bias in favor of loan guaran-
tees over other forms of federal assistance, such as direct loans or
grants, would be eliminated.

GAO's Capital Budget Proposal

As with the asset consumption charge, there would be an appropriation each year in the operating budget for the credit subsidy costs of direct loans and loan guarantees. The appropriated amounts would be transferred to the capital budget, where they would be dispersed when needed.

There are other operating costs not currently reported in the budget that should be, namely the annual accrued liabilities for pension programs. These amounts, however, would not involve transactions between the operating and capital budgets, and, as such, we did not shown them in table I.1. In our forthcoming summary report on budget restructuring, we discuss accrued costs for pension programs in greater detail.

In sum, the operating component of our restructured budget would
reflect the annual costs of the government's use of its physical capital
investments, the estimated subsidy costs associated with the budget
year's credit activities, and the accrued costs for pension programs, as
well as the costs for other current programs and activities. An operating
surplus/deficit would be reported based on these revenues and
expenses.

Capital Component of
Restructured Budget

The capital component of the restructured budget, as illustrated in table I.2, would report both capital revenues and capital investments; these amounts would represent cash revenues and disbursements. Capital revenues would include user fees, excise taxes, and similar amounts which are earmarked by law to finance physical and financial capital investments. Capital revenues would also include most loan principal repayments and interest paid by the Treasury on securities held by the capital trust funds.

Capital investments would include disbursements for physical assets
and financial assets. Physical assets would include tangible assets which
cost $100,000 or more and provide economic benefits for more than 2
years. Financial assets would include legal instruments, such as federal
direct loans, and guaranteed loans terminated for defaults, less the esti-
mated subsidy costs the government incurs. The disbursement amount
reported would represent a financial capital investment by the govern-
ment, similar to a physical capital investment. Just as the government
can acquire a fixed asset, such as a building, in exchange for cash, it also
can acquire a financial asset, such as a note receivable, in exchange for a
direct loan disbursement. Loan guarantee disbursements are similar.

« PreviousContinue »