Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... period . See Letter from Rodney Kaulupali to Dr. Lawrence Miike of DOH ( June 20 , 1997 ) ( the “ Comment Letter ” ) . DOH prepared a summary of the comments received during the com- ment period and provided written responses to the ...
... period . See Letter from Rodney Kaulupali to Dr. Lawrence Miike of DOH ( June 20 , 1997 ) ( the “ Comment Letter ” ) . DOH prepared a summary of the comments received during the com- ment period and provided written responses to the ...
Page 7
... period . ” In re Essex County ( N.J. ) Resource Recovery Facility , 5 E.A.D. 218 , 223-224 ( EAB 1994 ) ; accord In re Broward County , 4 E.A.D. 705 , 714 ( EAB 1993 ) . Section 124.19 ( a ) also requires that a petitioner both state ...
... period . ” In re Essex County ( N.J. ) Resource Recovery Facility , 5 E.A.D. 218 , 223-224 ( EAB 1994 ) ; accord In re Broward County , 4 E.A.D. 705 , 714 ( EAB 1993 ) . Section 124.19 ( a ) also requires that a petitioner both state ...
Page 8
... period is arbitrary , capricious and an abuse of discretion . " Petition at 3 . Waimana further argues that naphtha ... period , and because Waimana has not shown that DOH's responses to the comments that were raised regarding naphtha's ...
... period is arbitrary , capricious and an abuse of discretion . " Petition at 3 . Waimana further argues that naphtha ... period , and because Waimana has not shown that DOH's responses to the comments that were raised regarding naphtha's ...
Page 9
... period in this case . Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. §§ 124.13 and 124.19 , “ the petition must contain a demonstration that all reasonably ascertainable issues raised therein were first raised during the public comment period . " In re Essex ...
... period in this case . Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. §§ 124.13 and 124.19 , “ the petition must contain a demonstration that all reasonably ascertainable issues raised therein were first raised during the public comment period . " In re Essex ...
Page 12
... period , they will not be con- sidered as a basis for review of the Permit now on appeal . 15 Waimana also cites the Howekamp Letter for the proposition that the Region allegedly has stated that naphtha is “ available , ” Petition at 3 ...
... period , they will not be con- sidered as a basis for review of the Permit now on appeal . 15 Waimana also cites the Howekamp Letter for the proposition that the Region allegedly has stated that naphtha is “ available , ” Petition at 3 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AAQ Report action Agency air quality air quality analysis alleged amended Appeal Brief AQMD AQMD's ARCO argues argument asbestos BACT determination Board CERCLA chemical civil penalty Clarksburg clear error Cogeneration combined cycle complaint compliance Corp deny review DOH's response draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA facility FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous HELCO impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf major stationary sources mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell NSR Manual operation penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit application permit condition permit decision Petitioners petitions for review pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD increment PSD permit PSD program public comment period raised reduction regarding Region's Response regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft Self-Disclosure Policy Steeltech tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana WDNR