Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 40
... Penalty Policy by lowering the Region's proposed penalty to $ 60,000 . On appeal , B & R contends that ( 1 ) the Presiding Officer erred in finding B & R liable for violating the financial responsibility regulations because once the ELF ...
... Penalty Policy by lowering the Region's proposed penalty to $ 60,000 . On appeal , B & R contends that ( 1 ) the Presiding Officer erred in finding B & R liable for violating the financial responsibility regulations because once the ELF ...
Page 41
... penalty to $ 60,000 . After largely rati- fying the Region's application of the Penalty Policy , the Presiding Officer nevertheless found that a reduction in the penalty was warranted to account for evidence that B & R faced a difficult ...
... penalty to $ 60,000 . After largely rati- fying the Region's application of the Penalty Policy , the Presiding Officer nevertheless found that a reduction in the penalty was warranted to account for evidence that B & R faced a difficult ...
Page 53
... penalty on the com- pany's competitive posture vis - à - vis other companies , so as to ensure that the penalty would not “ destroy ” B & R . Appeal Brief at 11 , 17 ... Penalty The penalty provisions in VOLUME 8 B & R OIL COMPANY 333 53.
... penalty on the com- pany's competitive posture vis - à - vis other companies , so as to ensure that the penalty would not “ destroy ” B & R . Appeal Brief at 11 , 17 ... Penalty The penalty provisions in VOLUME 8 B & R OIL COMPANY 333 53.
Page 54
... Penalty The penalty provisions in RCRA Subtitle I direct the Administrator to assess a penalty for UST violations " which [ he or she ] determines is rea- sonable taking into account the seriousness of the violation and any good faith ...
... Penalty The penalty provisions in RCRA Subtitle I direct the Administrator to assess a penalty for UST violations " which [ he or she ] determines is rea- sonable taking into account the seriousness of the violation and any good faith ...
Page 63
... penalty proceeding , the Presiding Officer must consider any civil penalty policies issued by the Agency . 40 C.F.R. § 22.27 ( b ) . However , the Presiding Officer is not required to strictly follow any such policy , and can depart ...
... penalty proceeding , the Presiding Officer must consider any civil penalty policies issued by the Agency . 40 C.F.R. § 22.27 ( b ) . However , the Presiding Officer is not required to strictly follow any such policy , and can depart ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AAQ Report action Agency air quality air quality analysis alleged amended Appeal Brief AQMD AQMD's ARCO argues argument asbestos BACT determination Board CERCLA chemical civil penalty Clarksburg clear error Cogeneration combined cycle complaint compliance Corp deny review DOH's response draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA facility FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous HELCO impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf major stationary sources mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell NSR Manual operation penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit application permit condition permit decision Petitioners petitions for review pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD increment PSD permit PSD program public comment period raised reduction regarding Region's Response regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft Self-Disclosure Policy Steeltech tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana WDNR