Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 39
... parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by acci- dental releases resulting from the operation of USTs . Specifically , the Region asserted that B & R , as a petroleum marketing firm owning between 100 and 999 USTS , failed ...
... parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by acci- dental releases resulting from the operation of USTs . Specifically , the Region asserted that B & R , as a petroleum marketing firm owning between 100 and 999 USTS , failed ...
Page 41
... parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases from such tanks . In its amended complaint , Region V alleged that B & R , as a petroleum marketing firm owning from 100 to 999 underground storage tanks , had ...
... parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases from such tanks . In its amended complaint , Region V alleged that B & R , as a petroleum marketing firm owning from 100 to 999 underground storage tanks , had ...
Page 42
... parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks . " 40 C.F.R. ยง 280.93 ( a ) . The regulation at issue in this proceeding is authorized by ...
... parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks . " 40 C.F.R. ยง 280.93 ( a ) . The regulation at issue in this proceeding is authorized by ...
Page 46
... parties at a negotiated settlement failed . The Region filed a Prehearing Exchange on January 16 , 1992 , and received the Respondent's Prehearing Exchange and Rebuttal on February 3 , 1992. B & R also filed a Motion to Dismiss received ...
... parties at a negotiated settlement failed . The Region filed a Prehearing Exchange on January 16 , 1992 , and received the Respondent's Prehearing Exchange and Rebuttal on February 3 , 1992. B & R also filed a Motion to Dismiss received ...
Page 48
... parties submitted post - hearing briefs . The Presiding Officer issued his Initial Decision on September 8 , 1997 , finding B & R liable for the violations alleged in the Amended Complaint , but reducing the penalty to $ 60,000 . See ...
... parties submitted post - hearing briefs . The Presiding Officer issued his Initial Decision on September 8 , 1997 , finding B & R liable for the violations alleged in the Amended Complaint , but reducing the penalty to $ 60,000 . See ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AAQ Report action Agency air quality air quality analysis alleged amended Appeal Brief AQMD AQMD's ARCO argues argument asbestos BACT determination Board CERCLA chemical civil penalty Clarksburg clear error Cogeneration combined cycle complaint compliance Corp deny review DOH's response draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA facility FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous HELCO impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf major stationary sources mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell NSR Manual operation penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit application permit condition permit decision Petitioners petitions for review pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD increment PSD permit PSD program public comment period raised reduction regarding Region's Response regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft Self-Disclosure Policy Steeltech tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana WDNR