Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 13
... facility do not appear unreasonable . " Id . at 17 . Both this determination regarding the reasonableness of the required revisions to the facility and the facts regarding the issue of availability were discussed under the heading of ...
... facility do not appear unreasonable . " Id . at 17 . Both this determination regarding the reasonableness of the required revisions to the facility and the facts regarding the issue of availability were discussed under the heading of ...
Page 21
... facility and M17 and M19 is invalid and does not demonstrate a basis for review of the permit . Contrary to Waimana's assertion , the proposed KCP facility will not operate in true simple cycle mode . Rather , the KCP facility will ...
... facility and M17 and M19 is invalid and does not demonstrate a basis for review of the permit . Contrary to Waimana's assertion , the proposed KCP facility will not operate in true simple cycle mode . Rather , the KCP facility will ...
Page 37
... facilities have the potential for visible emissions , noise and odors , the existing facilities will likely have a greater effect on prop- erty values than the EDS facility . Furthermore , the effect on property values beyond two miles ...
... facilities have the potential for visible emissions , noise and odors , the existing facilities will likely have a greater effect on prop- erty values than the EDS facility . Furthermore , the effect on property values beyond two miles ...
Page 92
... facility for each pollutant subject to regulation under this chapter which will be emitted from such facility . ” CAA § 165 ( e ) ( 1 ) , 42 U.S.C. § 7475 ( e ) ( 1 ) . The CAA pro- vides further that : the analysis required by this ...
... facility for each pollutant subject to regulation under this chapter which will be emitted from such facility . ” CAA § 165 ( e ) ( 1 ) , 42 U.S.C. § 7475 ( e ) ( 1 ) . The CAA pro- vides further that : the analysis required by this ...
Page 121
... facility in light of alternative pollution control equipment configurations at other fiberglass manufacturing facilities . The record does not show that AQMD adequately considered the comments received on BACT . AQMD is to prepare a ...
... facility in light of alternative pollution control equipment configurations at other fiberglass manufacturing facilities . The record does not show that AQMD adequately considered the comments received on BACT . AQMD is to prepare a ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AAQ Report action Agency air quality air quality analysis alleged amended Appeal Brief AQMD AQMD's ARCO argues argument asbestos BACT determination Board CERCLA chemical civil penalty Clarksburg clear error Cogeneration combined cycle complaint compliance Corp deny review DOH's response draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA facility FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous HELCO impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf major stationary sources mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell NSR Manual operation penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit application permit condition permit decision Petitioners petitions for review pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD increment PSD permit PSD program public comment period raised reduction regarding Region's Response regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft Self-Disclosure Policy Steeltech tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana WDNR