Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 8
... contain clear error . 1. Objections That Were Not Raised During the Comment Period Will Not Be Considered in Support of the Petition In the Petition , Waimana raises a variety of arguments that were not raised during the public comment ...
... contain clear error . 1. Objections That Were Not Raised During the Comment Period Will Not Be Considered in Support of the Petition In the Petition , Waimana raises a variety of arguments that were not raised during the public comment ...
Page 9
... contain a demonstration that all reasonably ascertainable issues raised therein were first raised during the public comment period . " In re Essex County ( NJ ) Resource Recovery Facility , 5 E.A.D. 218 , 223-224 ( EAB 1994 ) ; accord ...
... contain a demonstration that all reasonably ascertainable issues raised therein were first raised during the public comment period . " In re Essex County ( NJ ) Resource Recovery Facility , 5 E.A.D. 218 , 223-224 ( EAB 1994 ) ; accord ...
Page 11
... contain any suggestion that the KCP per- mit had already determined that naphtha is available ; nor was there any suggestion that any such determination made in the KCP permit should be followed in this case . The general background ...
... contain any suggestion that the KCP per- mit had already determined that naphtha is available ; nor was there any suggestion that any such determination made in the KCP permit should be followed in this case . The general background ...
Page 21
... contained in the record , which clearly states that there are significant differences between the simple cycle operation con- templated by the Permit in this case and the cogeneration operation of the KCP project . DOH also has stated ...
... contained in the record , which clearly states that there are significant differences between the simple cycle operation con- templated by the Permit in this case and the cogeneration operation of the KCP project . DOH also has stated ...
Page 25
... contained in the permit . See 40 C.F.R. § 124.19 ( a ) ; In re Envotech , L.P. , 6 E.A.D. 260 , 265 ( EAB 1996 ) . - The SDWA and its implementing regulations prohibit any unauthorized underground injection . SDWA § 1421 ( b ) , 42 ...
... contained in the permit . See 40 C.F.R. § 124.19 ( a ) ; In re Envotech , L.P. , 6 E.A.D. 260 , 265 ( EAB 1996 ) . - The SDWA and its implementing regulations prohibit any unauthorized underground injection . SDWA § 1421 ( b ) , 42 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AAQ Report action Agency air quality air quality analysis alleged amended Appeal Brief AQMD AQMD's ARCO argues argument asbestos BACT determination Board CERCLA chemical civil penalty Clarksburg clear error Cogeneration combined cycle complaint compliance Corp deny review DOH's response draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA facility FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous HELCO impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf major stationary sources mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell NSR Manual operation penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit application permit condition permit decision Petitioners petitions for review pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD increment PSD permit PSD program public comment period raised reduction regarding Region's Response regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft Self-Disclosure Policy Steeltech tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana WDNR