Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 32
... policy matter deserving of review . See NE Hub Partners , 7 E.A.D. at 581-82 ( where permittee com- plied with the SDWA and applicable regulations , the Agency's failure to require permittee to conduct additional analyses of fluid to be ...
... policy matter deserving of review . See NE Hub Partners , 7 E.A.D. at 581-82 ( where permittee com- plied with the SDWA and applicable regulations , the Agency's failure to require permittee to conduct additional analyses of fluid to be ...
Page 40
... Policy ” ) , proposed a $ 76,601 penal- ty , which was calculated primarily to remove the economic benefit the company enjoyed by avoiding the cost of obtaining acceptable private insurance coverage during the alleged period of ...
... Policy ” ) , proposed a $ 76,601 penal- ty , which was calculated primarily to remove the economic benefit the company enjoyed by avoiding the cost of obtaining acceptable private insurance coverage during the alleged period of ...
Page 41
... Policy , the Presiding Officer nevertheless found that a reduction in the penalty was warranted to account for evidence that B & R faced a difficult market for insurance coverage and made limited inquiries into obtaining assur- ance ...
... Policy , the Presiding Officer nevertheless found that a reduction in the penalty was warranted to account for evidence that B & R faced a difficult market for insurance coverage and made limited inquiries into obtaining assur- ance ...
Page 47
... Policy " ) , the Region based its calculation of B & R's " avoided cost ” upon the premiums $ 86,000 — that a competitor within the same compliance category as B & R ( 100–999 USTs ) was required to pay under a private insurance policy ...
... Policy " ) , the Region based its calculation of B & R's " avoided cost ” upon the premiums $ 86,000 — that a competitor within the same compliance category as B & R ( 100–999 USTs ) was required to pay under a private insurance policy ...
Page 54
... Policy " ) , to implement this statutory directive and arrive at a proposed total penalty amount of $ 76,601 , made ... Policy , as B & R contends . The Presiding Officer largely ratified the Region's use of the Penalty Policy , and ...
... Policy " ) , to implement this statutory directive and arrive at a proposed total penalty amount of $ 76,601 , made ... Policy , as B & R contends . The Presiding Officer largely ratified the Region's use of the Penalty Policy , and ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AAQ Report action Agency air quality air quality analysis alleged amended Appeal Brief AQMD AQMD's ARCO argues argument asbestos BACT determination Board CERCLA chemical civil penalty Clarksburg clear error Cogeneration combined cycle complaint compliance Corp deny review DOH's response draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA facility FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous HELCO impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf major stationary sources mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell NSR Manual operation penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit application permit condition permit decision Petitioners petitions for review pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD increment PSD permit PSD program public comment period raised reduction regarding Region's Response regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft Self-Disclosure Policy Steeltech tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana WDNR