Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 71
Page 1
... DOH's SO , BACT decision , and ( b ) Waimana's argument based on DOH's own statements regarding the availability of naphtha fail to show any clear error in DOH's responses to comments . ( 2 ) Review of DOH's BACT determination for ...
... DOH's SO , BACT decision , and ( b ) Waimana's argument based on DOH's own statements regarding the availability of naphtha fail to show any clear error in DOH's responses to comments . ( 2 ) Review of DOH's BACT determination for ...
Page 3
... DOH's determinations of what constitutes “ best available control technology " for the control of regulated pollutants in PSD permits issued by DOH , and to concur on DOH's evaluation of air impact modeling analyses . Amended Delegation ...
... DOH's determinations of what constitutes “ best available control technology " for the control of regulated pollutants in PSD permits issued by DOH , and to concur on DOH's evaluation of air impact modeling analyses . Amended Delegation ...
Page 4
... DOH and the Region have filed responses in opposition to Waimana's petition for review of the Permit . DOH argues that ... DOH's Response " and to clarify Region 9's position with respect to certain issues raised on appeal . " EPA Region ...
... DOH and the Region have filed responses in opposition to Waimana's petition for review of the Permit . DOH argues that ... DOH's Response " and to clarify Region 9's position with respect to certain issues raised on appeal . " EPA Region ...
Page 6
... DOH's BACT analysis for SO , and NO 、 emissions in the present case , is to elimi- nate “ technically infeasible ” options . Id . at B.7 . This step involves first deter- mining for each technology whether it is " demonstrated ...
... DOH's BACT analysis for SO , and NO 、 emissions in the present case , is to elimi- nate “ technically infeasible ” options . Id . at B.7 . This step involves first deter- mining for each technology whether it is " demonstrated ...
Page 8
... DOH dated February 6 , 1996 ( the “ Howekamp Letter " ) . As further support of its con- tention that naphtha is available , and in support of its contention that naphtha is technically feasible , Waimana cites DOH's own BACT analysis ...
... DOH dated February 6 , 1996 ( the “ Howekamp Letter " ) . As further support of its con- tention that naphtha is available , and in support of its contention that naphtha is technically feasible , Waimana cites DOH's own BACT analysis ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
AAQ Report action Agency air quality air quality analysis alleged amended Appeal Brief AQMD AQMD's ARCO argues argument asbestos BACT determination Board CERCLA chemical civil penalty Clarksburg clear error Cogeneration combined cycle complaint compliance Corp deny review DOH's response draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA facility FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous HELCO impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf major stationary sources mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell NSR Manual operation penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit application permit condition permit decision Petitioners petitions for review pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD increment PSD permit PSD program public comment period raised reduction regarding Region's Response regulatory remand requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft Self-Disclosure Policy Steeltech tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana WDNR